Hi - I just "upgraded" my E-TEC props from 14 3/4" by 19" Vipers to 15 1/2" by 17" Rebels and tested them out yesterday. I put my "report" here:
http://www.etecownersgroup.com/post/Reb ... sh-6426775
The nutshell version based on this initial testing is slightly better low-speed performance in terms of RPM and slightly better fuel economy at fast cruising speeds. The WOT RPM went up by 150 to 5850 and the top speed dropped one kt to 48.5 MPH. Most economical cruising speed is 33 MPH at 4000 RPM and ~1.5 MPG. Load was medium to light with 125 gallons of fuel, full water and oil, some extra tools and gear but no passengers - just me.
I did the "plane on one engine" test with the Rebel prop and posted it on Youtube. I hit about 35 mph at 5100 RPM (with one engine out of the water) before backing down. The video is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PffCDl8WNM
My Sailfish is a 94 which has the shorter running surface - it should be easier (i.e, require less torque) to do this with a similarly loaded 98 or later Sailfish including the 282.
Some of the audio is difficult to hear but is explained in the video description. Also, there is a typo where I list the beam at 9'8" but I correct to 9'6" in the description.
-Scott
http://www.etecownersgroup.com/post/Reb ... sh-6426775
The nutshell version based on this initial testing is slightly better low-speed performance in terms of RPM and slightly better fuel economy at fast cruising speeds. The WOT RPM went up by 150 to 5850 and the top speed dropped one kt to 48.5 MPH. Most economical cruising speed is 33 MPH at 4000 RPM and ~1.5 MPG. Load was medium to light with 125 gallons of fuel, full water and oil, some extra tools and gear but no passengers - just me.
I did the "plane on one engine" test with the Rebel prop and posted it on Youtube. I hit about 35 mph at 5100 RPM (with one engine out of the water) before backing down. The video is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PffCDl8WNM
My Sailfish is a 94 which has the shorter running surface - it should be easier (i.e, require less torque) to do this with a similarly loaded 98 or later Sailfish including the 282.
Some of the audio is difficult to hear but is explained in the video description. Also, there is a typo where I list the beam at 9'8" but I correct to 9'6" in the description.
-Scott