f300's or f350's

Danos express

New Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2025
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
66
Model
Express 330
2006 330 Express 1200 hours on Yamaha 250's. Considering upgrade / repower with either 300 or 350 Yamahas. XSA. forums say check with G/W for blessing. Hull is rated for 850 hp. obviously i will check integrity of the transom prior to anything being done. But if the transom is bad ... the transom is bad ... wouldn't matter if it was 200's 225's etc. If the hull is rated for 850 hp why the concern for a total of 700hp ? These are NOT the V8's but the new V6's. Fill me in please . Thanks in advance.
 
The 2006 (and 2007 330 express hull that I have), is rated for a maximum of 600 hp according to the specifications in the owners manual. That manual is available online at the Grady-White website. I re-powered my boat with 300s and have been very pleased with the increased performance as opposed to the older 250s.I have not seen a higher rating for the 2006 and wonder where that number was derived from. I am certain you will not get a blessing from Grady-White to put anything higher than 600 hp on that hull.
 
Last edited:
05 250……… 605 lbs (what I have now)
26 300……….550 lbs ( what I can get)
26 350 V6….630 lbs (what I really want)
A total of 50 extra lbs on the ransom and 200 more hp
Or
Lose 100 lbs and gain 100 hp
I understand the express is no speed demon … but the advantage of lower rpms for the same SOG and better mpg really makes me lean towards that. Is 50 more lbs on the trans one that much of a big deal ? I get it … TORQUE .. that’s an issue as well … but I’m not looking for holeshot either … just looking for some other opinion on this.
 
You are correct and it is probably safe. If your insurance company doesn’t have an issue, I don’t think the engines are gonna fall off or sink the boat unless of course the transom is bad. And like you say if the transom is bad, it’s bad! If you are going forward with this, recommend you look at the performance bulletins that Grady provides for the 250s versus the 300s versus the 350s. They are all available on the Grady website and in my. Experience are really pretty accurate. I think given the difference in efficiency, ie. fuel consumption, you will likely not ever recover your re-powering costs. If reliability is very important, the 300s have a long proven history and are bulletproof. The 250s were also bulletproof except for the mid. Section corrosion issues in the earlier engines. The newer 350s appeared to be very reliable, but their history is relatively short, particularly for the V6. With regard to RPMs, I know the 300s and the 250s have different gearbox ratios so the actual propeller RPM is different and requires a different sized propeller. I had to change Props when repowering to the 300s. Good luck!